A rich survey of the doctrine of the Trinity
The Quest for the Trinity: The Doctrine of God in
Scripture, History and Modernity
Author: Stephen R. Holmes
Publisher: IVP Academic (www.ivpacademic.com)
Pages: 231
In The Quest for
the Trinity Stephen R. Holmes argues that recent scholarship on the Trinity
departs from traditional understandings. After a brief analysis of current
thought, he starts with how the Bible has been read, how it should be read, and
how patristic exegesis is different than our own. This period is analyzed in
detail because it is crucial to the formation of the doctrine of the Trinity.
From there Holmes moves to fourth century debates on the relationship between
Father, Son and Spirit.
Holmes looks at Augustine and the West before reviewing
anti-Trinitarianism around 1700. The nineteenth-century roots of the
twentieth-century revival of the doctrine are examined, before the book closes
with another glance at recent writers viewed in light of all that has been
considered.
Technical terms and doctrinal fine points make for
challenging reading of a book intended for upper-level undergraduates. It is
most readily absorbed by sustained concentration; it’s not bedtime reading.
It would be an excellent textbook on the history of the
doctrine of the Trinity. Christ spoke with authority, and on this subject, the
author does the same. His breadth of understanding is evident, enabling him to
guide readers through the labyrinth of history and debate.
What this lacks in readability is made up for in content.
Christ bid his disciples to cast into the deep for a catch. What I like about
this is that I can return to it knowing that I will be fishing in the depths
for those treasures of knowledge and wisdom which ultimately come from Christ.
Holmes does not resort to attacks in critiquing those
championing a revival of the doctrine. It’s more like laying a straight stick
next to a crooked one so that you can see the difference.
In the process, one begins to see this lofty teaching
more clearly. In speaking of the challenge faced by Gregory of Nyssa, the
author writes, “Gregory’s great need, then, was to defend simultaneously three
things: the core conception of deity as one, simple and undivided: the basic
binary metaphysical distinction between Creator and creation which therefore
does not admit any degrees of deity; and the exegetical and liturgical
imperative to confess that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are each real and
distinguishable, and each properly named God” (106-107).
In particular, I appreciated the often-repeated emphasis
on the simplicity of the divine nature, even if paradoxically, our ability to
articulate it and comprehend it will always fall short. Even so, in a summary
statement at the end, Holmes does an admirable job of defining the indefinable:
The divine nature is simple,
incomposite, and ineffable. It is also unrepeatable, and so, in crude and
inexact terms ‘one’ (199).
Even in these brief quotations, one can see the complex
language. It is a banquet for scholars but a challenge to digest for the
average Christian. However, those hearing the call to come up higher will find
the means here. God rewards the smallest of steps.